其實天星與皇后,都不是「必要」拆的

官府現形記之一:保留皇后碼頭民間公聽會錄影摘要

無良官員誇大合約範圍 天星碼頭死得冤枉

廣告

6 則迴響

Filed under 回顧、反思和展望 Revisits and Reflections, 影音資料 Audio-Visual Materials

6 responses to “其實天星與皇后,都不是「必要」拆的

  1. Lady Cat

    Can you give us the reasons, why don’t disassemble the Queen Ferry and Star Ferry?

    I don’t understand why do we have to keep the 2 similar function and close each other ferry? Especially the low utility rate of Queen Ferry .

    Why don’t rearrange / reallocate the limit resourse to achieve the highest efficiency? And slove the traffic jam problem?

  2. 請讀最新的文化界支持原地保留聲明.

  3. Lady Cat

    no al…….

    I don’t want to spend time to read thousand and thousand words for keeping someone / small group memories

    Perhaps, you explain the main points and reasonable points for me

  4. Lady Cat

    Perhaps, you can go to my website to see why I dislike to keep the no value building and include with the other people comment.

    http://talkinglove.wordpress.com/2007/03/22/%e9%9b%86%e9%ab%94%e5%9b%9e%e6%86%b6/

  5. >I don’t want to spend time to read thousand and thousand words for keeping someone / small group memories.

    what kind of attitude is it?
    there are many important things in life (THAT IS NOT THE discourse of collective memory as described by the mass media in a too simple way) that need to be treassure, including having the patience to really understand what others think.

    i can see why you keep your stand. because you have no time and no patience to read many of the different writings that have different reasons and standpoint of why people want to keep the piers.

    it is not a concern of a small group of people.

    maybe you are interested to read the statement of cultural and edu field?

  6. amazing stuff thanx 🙂

    rH3uYcBX

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s